Qualitics #541
14 January, 2025
A global automotive manufacturer needed to reduce software testing cycle time across multiple QA teams working in parallel—without compromising quality or increasing coordination complexity.
Read MoreA global automotive manufacturer needed to reduce software testing cycle time across multiple QA teams working in parallel—without compromising quality or increasing coordination complexity.
Read MoreOrganizations are increasingly turning to test automation, but choosing between classic (coded), codeless, and AI-powered options is often driven by trends rather than strategic alignment. The result: misaligned tool choice, unexpected quality gaps, and inefficient resource use.
Read MoreA healthcare technology company needed to automate their QA process to meet aggressive product release timelines—without increasing headcount or hiring specialized SDETs.
Read MoreA global ticketing provider was struggling with a stagnant QA automation effort. The automation pipeline was outdated, inflexible, and misaligned with evolving development practices—resulting in slow releases, redundant manual testing, and reduced confidence in coverage.
Read MorePlease Sign in to View This Content.
Not a Member? Register Now